The above link is to an interesting article over at Rolling Stone about the deal that Obama made with China over climate change. Rolling Stone’s music coverage is pretty terrible, but they have pretty great investigative political reporting. I kind of look at what they do as being like a Trojan horse. They put out a magazine that is mostly meaningless pop drivel on the outside, but inside they actually have some articles that are trying to make people think. I can’t really get too mad at them as long as they keep people like Matt Taibbi and others employed.
I spent most of the day either at rehearsal or learning about Stonewall Jackson. S.C. Gwynne has written another captivating book. I’m not far enough into it to feel that I can talk about it, but there is no question that Jackson was a “unique” individual. Today was one of those days that slipped through my grasp. One minute I’m drinking coffee and the next the sun is going down.
After this recent election, which seems to defy reason, I have been looking for answers about our current political climate in our history and culture. How did we arrive at this moment in time? Take climate change for instance, something for which Obama just made a great step forward with his deal with China. (I am still reading up on our deal with China for more specifics.) The fact that climate change is occurring is scientific fact. There is some uncertainty as to the exact outcome, but don’t get confused by the word uncertainty. Think about if a large rainstorm came in. You know that the ground will be soaked, but you can’t say for certain if the big oak tree out front is going to fall over. That however, doesn’t mean it is not raining. Anyway, so science and all reason point to climate change happening, yet not only does a portion of the populace not believe it is real, but we have elected officials that are not scientists, that claim they know more than scientists, going to be in charge of parts of our environmental policy.
Now there is no doubt that these people are for the most part bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. You don’t have to be Columbo to deduce that. You also don’t have to be Columbo to figure out that the regions with the most jobs in the fossil fuel industry are also the regions that are most against us doing anything about climate change. Yet I don’t think it is as simple as a mere question of economics.
From the very beginning of our country there is an element that is against any kind of centralized authority. Part of our country also puts faith above reason. I just read in the Stonewall Jackson book last night that in 1850 Florida only had 85,000 inhabitants and half of them were slaves. It is hard to imagine that modern Florida, with Disney World and Miami and the countless beach resorts, was created in 164 years, which is the lifespan of two humans. Go to Miami and think about how two lives ago it was a desolate swamp. As far as civilization goes our country is but a baby.
I am still thinking about all of this myself. I wanted to ask those of you that read this a rhetorical question. How does our unique American history and culture affect the way in which we think politically? Places that were settled by different ethnic and religious groups often ended up quite different. Places that had to subdue the land and keep people oppressed often ended up quite different than places that were booming with industry. All of these things factor into who we are now. How so?
The above link is a simple explanation of the importance of net neutrality. It will let you know why it is important and how not having it affect your internet usage. It also shits on Ted Cruz, which always makes everything better.
Obama has urged the FCC to support net neutrality with the, “strongest possible rules.” The above link is to a Huffpo article about the subject. This is great news for the country.
I found this interview with Russell Brand from Salon very interesting. That’s not to say that my reposting of it is a rubber stamp for everything he says, but I do find him to be intelligent. He is willing to look beneath the surface of our, and England’s, national bullshit story. A sample:
Why do you think it is that your message can get applause on the Letterman show — which is probably American tourists from all over the country — and yet the revolution that we have had most recently is a Tea Party revolution, that essentially started with CNBC and a talking head who was outraged that homeowners were getting bailed out. He blamed all the wrong people, and we’ve not exactly had the equivalent revolutionary movement on the left.
I think I understand. Could I borrow your paper? (starts drawing) I think it’s because of the way the energy must move. I think it’s selfishness. Say that Republicans run on selfishness and greed — which is in all of us — I think the way that that energy travels is fast and in short journeys. I think altruism might have a longer journey. I think it might move more slowly. So I think if you’re trying to fire people up on this sort of fear circuit – these ancient systems of anatomical survival, of selfishness and greed, they’ve been functioning for a long, long time. Now we have a culture that is predicated on those things. We’ve acculturated aspects of our nature that are required only for our survival. And if they are overstimulated, fear and desire create a kind of primeval prison.
So I think why it’s easier to get a Tea Party message, a Republican message, across is because they function on fear and desire. These are fast-moving circuits. It’s very hard for me to motivate myself to meditate and do yoga. It’s very easy to motivate myself to eat chocolate or pursue attractive women. There is a lot of fire for those things. So I suppose what we have to do is look at the methods of communication. That’s why I have to go on “Today.” That’s why I have to talk a certain way. That’s why, I suppose, I haven’t yet left, entirely, this aquarium or arena. Because it’s not time yet.
Recently I posted an article where Cornel West criticized President Obama from the perspective of the left. The right wing is not serious in its criticism of Obama as they have pretty much been against everything Obama has done since day one of his presidency. The above article is from Rolling Stone Magazine and it is an article by Paul Krugman who defends Obama’s presidency. It’s worth a read as it may give you a different perspective on recent political events. I personally go back and forth how I feel about his presidency. At all times I support him over the opposition, because well, the opposition seems nothing short of insane to me. However, that does not mean that I support everything he has done. I am troubled by our use of drones among other policies. Anyway, if you don’t think Obama is an Islamic communist, then check out the article. It is definitely an interesting perspective.
Cornel West: “The state of Black America in the age of Obama has been one of desperation, confusion and capitulation” http://www.salon.com/2014/10/05/cornel_west_the_state_of_black_america_in_the_age_of_obama_has_been_one_of_desperation_confusion_and_capitulation/
Salon has been pretty terrible lately. It has slowly been turning into a Huffington Post that seems designed to generate as many clicks as possible through ridiculous headlines. It might soon be time to delete this app on my phone as well. But, for the time being, there are still some really great articles there. I found this criticism of President Obama, by Cornel West, from a leftwing perspective, interesting. I think criticism of leaders is important, even if you support them over the opposition. If you understand how politics work, then you know that the people often lead the leaders towards making changes.